AI summary
- Elon Musk said on X that SpaceXAI will be renamed SpaceXSI, replying "Yes, we will make that change" to a user's question.
- No date has been announced, and as of Sunday the company's website and official social accounts still used the old name.
- The wider tech industry hasn't adopted "super intelligence" as a replacement for "AI", and some experts say the term could cause confusion.
- For .si buyers, only plain generic words are worth considering, never a copy of a company's brand such as spacexsi.si.
- Most .si names are speculation with a small aftermarket, so if the .com is available at a fair price, buy the .com instead.
What Musk actually said
On Sunday, Elon Musk said his AI company, SpaceXAI, will be renamed SpaceXSI. A user on X asked, "Any possibility of renaming to SpaceXSI??" and Musk replied, "Yes, we will make that change," according to the ANI report carried by Lokmat Times.
The Daily Jagran adds that he then posted there would be "No more AI" and that "SI" was better. The BBC also reported the plan, in the same piece that covered the new Super Intelligence Force.
I've already written about that taskforce, so I won't repeat it here. For .si buyers, I think the rename is the bigger story. It's a company, not a government, choosing SI for its own name.
What's confirmed and what isn't
Here's what the sources actually support:
- Where SpaceXAI came from. It was set up after SpaceX acquired xAI, which brought the Grok chatbot into the wider SpaceX business.
- No date yet. There's been no formal announcement of when the change takes effect. As of Sunday, SpaceXAI's website and official social media accounts still used the existing name.
- Brand, not product. The Daily Jagran describes it as a shift in branding, not an immediate change to core products, underlying models or technical infrastructure.
- Musk's already on board. The Hindu notes he was one of the leaders who signed the White House's Accord on Super Intelligence. At a recent event alongside Trump, he briefly said "AI" before correcting himself to "SI".
So this is a reply on X, not a launch. Until the website and accounts change, I'd treat it as stated intent rather than a finished rebrand.
One company isn't the whole industry
It's tempting to read this as the moment SI goes mainstream. I don't think the sources let you say that yet.
The Daily Jagran reports that a few executives, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, have started using the phrase, but the broader technology industry hasn't adopted "super intelligence" as a replacement for "AI". The BBC notes that some experts have questioned the logic of the rebrand, arguing it could cause confusion because super intelligence refers to more advanced systems.
The legal side hasn't moved either. Crypto News Australia reports that the order leaves the legal meaning unchanged, tying SI to the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence. The Assistant to the President for Science and Technology has been directed to propose a federal definition of "Super Intelligence" and "SI", according to Lokmat Times and The Hindu.
There's an irony worth noting. Lokmat Times points out that Musk previously endorsed and contributed to Nick Bostrom's 2014 book "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies", which examined the risks of uncontrollable superintelligence. The word he once linked to a warning is now set to become part of his company's name.
What it means for .si domains
A big brand saying "SI" is better puts those two letters in front of a lot of people. If other companies follow, more founders will look for names that end in SI, and a .si address is the most literal way to get one. That's the hopeful case, and it's still a maybe.
Here's the part I want to be blunt about. Don't register spacexsi.si, or any other company's name plus SI. That's a copy of someone else's brand. It's the kind of name that invites a dispute, and it's not something I'd sell or recommend. The only .si names worth thinking about are plain generic words that no single company owns.
A few from my own inventory that fit this story, with the data I have on each:
- aimarket.si, $4,500. The .com is listed at $594,888 and the .ai at $47,995. 12,100 searches a month.
- greatmind.si, $2,000. A brandable name for a reasoning model, tutor or mentor. The .com is listed at $500,000 and the .ai is for sale, price on request.
- aiprompts.si, $5,500. Over 200,000 searches a month worldwide for the exact phrase, and the .ai twin is listed at $44,500. The .com has been held since 2018.
- futurehuman.si, $1,500. The .ai version asks $290,000 and the .com has been held since 1999. It's the SI conversation in two words.
You can see the full list at aidomains.si.
Should you buy a .si name because of this?
Not because of this alone. One company's reply on X, with no date attached, isn't a reason to spend money. Most .si names are speculation, and the aftermarket for them is small. You can't count on reselling quickly.
A .si only makes sense when the alternatives are taken or priced out of reach. Run any name through three questions:
- Is the .com and the .ai taken or expensive? If you can get the .com at a fair price, buy the .com. It's still the better buy for most businesses.
- Is it a generic name and not a brand? Plain words like "market" or "prompts" are fair game. A company's name with SI on the end isn't.
- Do people search for it? If nobody types the phrase, the domain won't bring you visitors, whatever happens to the term SI.
If a name passes all three, and you'd still want it even if SI fades, it's worth a look. If it only works because Musk said SI is better, I'd wait and see whether SpaceXSI actually appears on the company's website first.
Names from this store that pass the test
Questions
Has SpaceXAI already changed its name to SpaceXSI?
Not yet. No formal announcement has been made on when the change takes effect, and as of Sunday SpaceXAI's website and official social media accounts still used the existing name.
Does the rename change Grok or SpaceXAI's products?
The Daily Jagran reports it's a branding shift, not an immediate change to core products, underlying models or technical infrastructure. Grok came into the SpaceX business when SpaceX acquired xAI.
Has the wider tech industry switched from AI to SI?
No. A few executives, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, have started using the phrase, but the broader technology industry hasn't adopted "super intelligence" as a replacement for "AI".
What does the executive order behind this actually require?
The order, titled "Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence" and signed on 29 September, directs US executive branch departments and agencies to use "Super Intelligence" and "SI" in official correspondence, public communications, policy documents and non-statutory documents. It leaves the legal meaning unchanged, tying SI to the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence.
Sources
- The Daily Jagran, 2026-10-04
- BBC, 2026-10-04
- The Hindu, 2026-10-04
- Lokmat Times, 2026-10-04
- Crypto News Australia, 2026-10-04
This post was researched and drafted with AI help from the sources above, then checked by me before publishing. Facts are as reported on the dates shown.